Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 05:54

Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
My son is possessed, now he has psychosis. Can someone help me?
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
One of Pop’s Hottest Stars Posted a Risqué Album Cover. All Hell Broke Loose. - Slate Magazine
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Padilla says FBI agent, Guard member escorted him to Noem's briefing before removal - Axios
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
NASA is already great. Right now. - NASA Watch
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is your reaction to the controversial remarks made on YouTube show "India's Got Latent"?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Nintendo Warns Switch 2 Owners Not to Remove Protective Screen Film - CNET
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
49ers' Williams healthy, introspective in year 16 - ESPN
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.